This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
What doctor makes his patient, recovering from two minor heart attacks within 48 hours, take a blood test for another three hours?" I replaced the oxygen tank for the lady in room 2006 while we talked about our favorite cross-country workouts, and I laid a blanket over the grandpa in room 2014 while we talked about football.
A: I’ve always had an interest in historical work—I spent some time doing a postdoc in bioethics because I wanted to learn how to take the historical work and arguments that I was making, and apply them in a way that might impact what people were doing on the ground, or maybe shape policies. 2006 Ellen D.
According to UC’s amicus brief filed to the Supreme Court last summer, these policies improved geographic diversity and increased the representation of low-income students but proved inadequate to bring racial diversity to UC’s student body that is representative of the state. In this respect, much groundwork has already been laid.
The petition says the policy directly hurts campus diversity. are petitioning to eliminate legacy admissions — university policies that favor children of alums, faculty, and staff in admissions. Georgetown projected a decrease in enrollment from underrepresented groups. As of Sept. 11, there are over 700 signatures. "In
The Supreme Court ruled against race-conscious admissions policies at Harvard and the University of North Carolina. Universities in states that banned affirmative action have experienced a drop in minority enrollments. Its decision left open the possibility of students using application essays to address race.
The proposal would create a grant program within the Department of State to expand study abroad options to nontraditional destinations and increase the number of minority students, first-generation college students, community college students, and students with disabilities studying abroad.
Non-science majors also allow for a break from science work, opportunities for experiences unique from other applicants, and interdisciplinary education that will help you throughout your career as you navigate public policy, pharmaceutical economics, teaching, or any other non-patient-facing task you may have to handle as an MD.
It’s worth noting that nine states - California (1996), Washington (1998), Florida (1999), Michigan (2006), Nebraska (2008), Arizona (2010), New Hampshire (2012), Oklahoma (2012), and Idaho (2020) – already had bans on affirmative action in place. More public universities may establish auto-admit policies.
They were also unsuccessful: By the schools’ own admission, no combination of these workarounds worked to enroll the number of underrepresented minority students the universities sought. These methods were, to differing degrees, creative, expensive and legally fishy. Outreach was the obvious choice.
Practitioners are key in forming informed policy that benefits students, the state, and schools. Bollinger dealing with the university’s undergraduate admissions policies and Grutter v. Bollinger that addressed the policies of the university’s law school. That is why I find this so rewarding and so required.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content